Yussupov, A N and Yussupova, A A (2022) Ecological houses of southern Kazakhstan using renewable energy sources. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(3), pp. 593-607. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article discusses the design of underground eco-houses using a dome structure of light construction while taking into account the historical experience of the development of the local population. This article considered the traditions of folk architecture and modern sophistication in the creation of energy-efficient eco-houses in foreign countries in the context of architecture and construction of affordable residential homes for the local population. Design/methodology/approach: The research presented in this paper was motivated by the need for developing agro-tourism facilities in hard-to-reach areas of the Silk Road in Southern Kazakhstan causes the construction of eco-houses built using local construction materials. Since ancient times in Southern Kazakhstan and during seasonal migrations in yurts of light construction, people have lived in mud-brick houses deep in the ground. Along with architectural and artistic solutions in building construction, great importance was attached to saving material resources, labour costs and achieving heat stability of residential buildings. Findings: In the architectural and planning solution of the eco¬-house, progressive directions of construction of agrotechnical structures using renewable energy sources are adopted. Particular importance was given to the choice of the construction site on an elevated area nearby historical monuments and a favourable season for the construction of eco-houses with considering the natural and climatic characteristics of rural areas of Southern Kazakhstan. Research limitations/implications: This paper discussed the issues of insulation, ventilation and improving the eco-house microclimate comfort using local building materials. Improving the architectural and artistic expressiveness of the eco-house in terms of the tradition of folk architecture was also explicitly discussed in this paper. Practical implications: Tables with the justification of expediency of construction of economical eco-houses in natural and climatic conditions of Kazakhstan and Central Asia are provided. The results help to improve the energy efficiency of eco-houses in Kazakhstan by using renewable energy sources. Social implications: Social benefits are associated with the use of local raw materials. Eco-houses built from traditional building materials can become accessible to a wide range of people and stimulate the development of small businesses. This may be associated with the construction of eco-houses to serve visiting tourists in remote picturesque oases, as well as the manufacture of dome structures, felt products and the preparation of reed panels and so on. Originality/value: The thermotechnical characteristics of the region's ground energy are given, which can significantly save the cost of heating the eco-house. Solutions for optimal insolation, ventilation of the eco-house are provided, taking into account the natural and climatic conditions of Southern Kazakhstan.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | domed houses; eco-house; energy efficiency; Kazakhstan; silk road |
| Index terms: | traditional building, construction material, microclimate, labour cost, comfort, building material, rural area, insulation, energy efficiency, residential building, climatic condition, monument, migration, Kazakhstan, population, small business, methodology, Asia, tourism, renewable energy source, social benefit, stability, construction site, building construction, ventilation |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, cost management, land use and regional development, demography, occupational health and safety management, building construction, Geography, architectural elements, theoretical framing, structural engineering, research methods, energy systems, regions and continents, work location, building materials, sustainability and energy, climate science, construction type, air quality, organization |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Design Practice, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here