Doan, D T; GhaffarianHoseini, A; Naismith, N; Ghaffarianhoseini, A; Zhang, T and Tookey, J (2023) An empirical examination of green star certification uptake and its relationship with BIM adoption in New Zealand. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(1), pp. 84-104. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: Green building information modelling (BIM) has been highlighted as an essential topic owing to its potential benefits. However, both Green Star and BIM are still in their earlier stages in New Zealand. This paper aims to examine and evaluate the benefits, barriers/challenges and solutions for the integration of Green Star and BIM in New Zealand. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, a total of 77 responses collected from construction professionals in New Zealand using questionnaires were analysed through descriptive and statistical tests. Findings: Building performance modelling used for Green Star assessment can be implemented using BIM; this was highlighted as the most significant benefit of the integration. Whereas, the most significant barrier preventing the integration of Green Star and BIM was the fact they are two completely separate processes. Regarding the solutions for the integration, showcasing BIM-Green Star benchmark projects was considered as the most effective solution amongst a range of eight provided. Originality/value: The research provided insights into Green Star–BIM integration in New Zealand. By evaluating the significance of the benefits, barriers/challenges and solutions for the integration, this research could be used as a guideline for Green Star and BIM development by New Zealand Green Building Council (NZGBC), the Government and construction practitioners in New Zealand. Specifically, the results here could be valuable inputs for Green Star manuals and the New Zealand BIM handbook.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; green building information modelling; green rating systems; green star; New Zealand; New Zealand Green Building Council |
| Index terms: | integration, methodology, green building, questionnaire, statistical test, certification, building performance, construction practitioner, construction professional, modelling, building information modelling, New Zealand, green rating, information modelling |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, analytical methods, research methods, sustainability assessment, design practice, digital design, professional development, Geography, organizational analysis, statistical analysis, quality assurance, information systems, administrative processes |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Sustainability, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here