Blockchain technology: A catalyst for reverse logistics of the automobile industry

Bajar, K; Kamat, A; Shanker, S and Barve, A (2024) Blockchain technology: A catalyst for reverse logistics of the automobile industry. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(1), pp. 133-178. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: In recent times, reverse logistics (RL) is gaining significant traction in various automobile industries to recapture returned vehicles' value. A good RL program can lower manufacturing costs, establish a green supply chain, enhance customer satisfaction and provide a competitive advantage. However, reducing disruptions and increasing operational efficiency in the automobile RL requires implementing innovative technology to improve information flow and security. Thus, this manuscript aims to examine the hurdles in automobile RL activities and how they can be effectively tackled by blockchain technology (BCT). Merging BCT and RL provides the entire automobile industry a chance to generate value for its consumers through effective vehicle return policies, manufacturing cost reduction, maintenance records tracking, administration of vehicle information and a clear payment record of insurance contracts. Design/methodology/approach: This research is presented in three stages to accomplish the task. First, previous literature and experts' opinions are examined to highlight certain factors that are an aggravation to BCT implementation. Next, this study proposed an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set (IVIFS) – decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) with Choquet integral framework for computing and analyzing the comparative results of factor interrelationships. Finally, the causal outline diagrams are plotted to determine the influence of factors on one another for BCT implementation in automobile RL. Findings: This study has categorized the barriers to BCT implementation into five major factors – operational and strategical, technical, knowledge and behavioral, financial and infrastructural, and government rules and regulations. The results revealed that disreputable technology, low-bearing capacity of IT systems and operational inefficiency are the most significant factors to be dealt with by automobile industry professionals for finer and enhanced RL processes utilizing BCT. The most noticeable advantage of BCT is its enormous amount of data, permitting automobile RL to develop client experience through real-time data insights. Practical implications: This study reveals several factors that are hindering the implementation of BCT in RL activities of the automobile industry. The results can assist experts and policymakers improve their existing decision-making systems while making an effort to implement BCT into the automobile industry's RL activities. Originality/value: Although there are several studies on the benefits of BCT in RL and the adoption of BCT in the automobile industry, individually, none have explicated the use of BCT in automobile RL. This is also the first kind of study that has used IVIFS-DEMATEL with the Choquet integral framework for computing and analyzing the comparative results of factor interrelationships hindering BCT implementation in automobile RL activities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: automobile industry; blockchain technology; distributed ledger; industry 4.0; reverse logistics; supply chain management
Index terms: fuzzy set, efficiency, industry 4.0, competitive advantage, real-time data, implementation, reverse logistics, blockchain, insurance, customer satisfaction, information flow, laboratory, automobile industry, cost reduction, decision-making, methodology, program, traction, regulation, computing
Subjects: decision analysis, research management, market analysis, data management, political science, information systems, transportation engineering, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, performance management, economics, research methods, supply chain operations, software systems, service delivery, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, technology adoption, computing systems
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here