Towards a circular economy: A knowledge-attitude gap between demand and supply-side operators on green building construction in Ghana

Dadzoe, F; Addy, M; Duah, D Y A and Adesi, M (2024) Towards a circular economy: A knowledge-attitude gap between demand and supply-side operators on green building construction in Ghana. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(4), pp. 763-779. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: To be able to achieve the uptake and usage of green buildings requires various actors within the construction value chain to be engaged. Despite its global uptake, green building construction is still at its nascent stage in Ghana. Most studies in sub-Saharan Africa point to the lack of knowledge as one of the mitigating factors against its development. However, there is a dearth of studies assessing the level of knowledge of stakeholders. The terms “knowledge” and “awareness” of green building construction are often used interchangeably in the Ghanaian Construction Industry (GCI). This study seeks to unearth the level of knowledge of stakeholders on green building construction through a comparative analysis of construction professionals and demand-side operators. Design/methodology/approach: A structured questionnaire was issued to professionals in the various recognised bodies in the construction industry and public and private institutions in Ghana. Frequency, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, median statistics and Mann–Whitney U-Test were used to rank and analyse the level of knowledge of stakeholders. Findings: Construction professionals were more aware of green building construction than the demand-side operators. It was further identified that only a few of these stakeholders had hands-on experience as the majority of them have gained their awareness through research studies. Based on the findings of the study, it was revealed that the concept of green building construction is more abstract to stakeholders than practical despite their positive attitude towards its adoption. Practical implications: Contextually, the study has aided in showing the level of knowledge of stakeholders on green building construction. The findings of the study aside from it aiding policymakers have also helped in identifying the perceptions and attitudes of stakeholders, their strengths and weakness in green building construction. It is recommended that due to the differences in socio-political structures and construction methods, a clear definition of green building based on the availability of resources in the GCI will encourage its adoption. Originality/value: The study used two stakeholder groupings in the GCI as the unit of analysis. This enabled insightful discoveries into the knowledge-attitude gap of Ghanaian stakeholders that are driving the adoption of green building.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: attitude; construction professionals; demand-side operators; green building construction; knowledge
Index terms: questionnaire, circular economy, construction method, green building, construction professional, statistics, construction industry, value chain, Sub-Saharan Africa, Ghana, methodology, comparative analysis
Subjects: design practice, sustainable design, mathematical modelling, value chain strategy, professional development, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, physical geography and landforms, research methods, building construction, industry analysis, Geography
Topics: Geographical Context, Information Management, Sustainability, Site Management, Research Practice, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here