Dessouky, N; Wheeler, S and Salama, A M (2024) Including local actors' perspective in neighborhood sustainability assessment: Evidence from Dubai's sustainable city. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(5), pp. 1117-1133. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: Existing Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment (NSA) tools such as "Leadership for Energy and Environmental Design - Neighborhood Development" (LEED-ND) and "Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method" (BREEAM Communities) are widely criticized for a lack of transparency in the selection of indicators and an unbalanced focus on specific sustainability dimensions. Design/methodology/approach: This paper asks how the expectations and use values of the professionals and residents involved in developing, designing, managing and living in a sustainable neighborhood can shape sustainability indicators that affect progress towards project goals. Taking as its focus The Sustainable City (TSC), a neighborhood in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE), the paper develops data from in-depth, go-along interviews with 46 different actors. Findings: Findings indicate that when given the opportunity to express their opinion, many actors will prioritize metrics different than the metrics dictated to the by sustainability experts and international rating systems. The findings suggest that NSA tools should place greater emphasis on local factors, public engagement and operational concerns. Practical implications: The paper provides a method that any community can replicate to better understand the different use values of local actors and establish its own NSA tool. This can help experts learn how design, management and operational decisions interact to impact different dimensions of performance. Originality/value: This paper recognizes sustainable neighborhoods as spaces with multiple identities. Hence, the indicators used to evaluate these neighborhoods need to be based on the expectations and use values of different actors. This paper proposes using the priorities of different local actors to reshape how these neighborhoods are assessed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | indicators; local; metrics; neighborhoods; operational; participatory; sustainable; interview |
| Index terms: | BREEAM accreditation, Dubai, building research, interview, sustainability assessment, sustainability indicator, United Arab Emirates, environmental assessment, methodology, evidence, environmental design, public engagement, sustainable city, dimension, transparency, identity |
| Subjects: | sociology, research management, urban design, professional development, Geography, research methods, sustainability assessment, health monitoring assessment and metrics, participation process, sustainability and energy, environmental policy, environmental impact, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here