Kordestani Ghalenoei, N; Babaeian Jelodar, M; Paes, D and Sutrisna, M (2024) Challenges of offsite construction and BIM implementation: Providing a framework for integration in New Zealand. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(4), pp. 780-808. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The development of prefabrication into full-scale offsite manufacturing processes in the construction industry is paradigm-shifting. Moreover, Building Information Modelling (BIM) is becoming the primary mode of communication and integration in construction projects to facilitate the flow of information. Although research has been performed on BIM and Offsite Construction (OSC), integrating these two concepts remains ambiguous and complex and lacks documentation and structure, especially in New Zealand. Therefore, this paper develops a robust framework for OSC and BIM integration. The study focusses on identifying integration challenges and proposes strategies for overcoming these challenges. Design/methodology/approach: This study applied scientometric analysis, a systematic literature review (SLR) and semi-structured expert interviews to investigate OSC and BIM integration challenges. Multiple themes were investigated and triangulation conducted in this research supports the creation of applicable knowledge in this field. Findings: Multiple gaps, research trends and the pioneer countries in the paper's scope have been identified through scientometric analysis. Then, a classified cluster of challenges for OSC and BIM implementation and integration strategies of OSC and BIM were demonstrated from the findings. The interviews provided comprehensive and complementary data sets and analyses. The findings from the Systematic Literature Review and interview structured the integration framework. Originality/value: The contribution of this paper to existing knowledge is a developed framework that serves as a guideline for the OSC stakeholders. This framework can assess OSC's alignment with BIM and consolidate strategies for incorporating OSC into a BIM-based project delivery process. The framework consists of 23 strategies categorised into 8 clusters: a policy document, training and professional development, documentation, technology management, governmental development, contract development, accurate definition and detailing and communication. The proposed strategies will streamline integration by reducing potential challenges, thus enhancing project productivity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; construction projects; New Zealand; offsite construction; scientometric analysis |
| Index terms: | technology management, implementation, New Zealand, manufacturing process, integration, methodology, productivity, prefabrication, documentation, building information modelling, becoming, construction industry, systematic literature review, interview, project delivery, strategy, construction project, paradigm, professional development, triangulation |
| Subjects: | management, education and knowledge transfer, professional development, information systems, manufacturing engineering, building construction, research methods, innovation studies, research design and methodology, data collection methods, project delivery, philosophical process, contractual arrangements, production management, Geography, research evaluation and metrics, organizational analysis, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Project Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Procurement, Geographical Context, Information Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here