Oke, A E; Aliu, J; Fadamiro, P; Jamir Singh, P S; Samsurijan, M S and Yahaya, M (2024) Robotics and automation for sustainable construction: Microscoping the barriers to implementation. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(3), pp. 625-643. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: This study presents the results of an assessment of the barriers that can hinder the deployment of robotics and automation systems in developing countries through the lens of the Nigerian construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: A scoping literature review was conducted through which barriers to the adoption of robotics and automation systems were identified, which helped in the formulation of a questionnaire survey. Data were obtained from construction professionals including architects, builders, engineers and quantity surveyors. Retrieved data were analyzed using percentages, frequencies, mean item scores and exploratory factor analysis. Findings: Based on the mean scores, the top five barriers were the fragmented nature of the construction process, resistance by workers and unions, hesitation to adopt innovation, lack of capacity and expertise and lack of support from top-level managers. Through factor analysis, the barriers identified were categorized into four principal clusters namely, industry, human, economic and technical-related barriers. Practical implications: This study provided a good theoretical and empirical foundation that can be useful to construction industry stakeholders, decision-makers, policymakers and the government in mapping out strategies to promote the incorporation and deployment of automation and robotics into the construction industry to attain the safety benefits they offer. Originality/value: By identifying and evaluating the challenges that hinder the implementation of robotics and automation systems in the Nigerian construction industry, this study makes a significant contribution to knowledge in an area where limited studies exist.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; construction; construction projects; digital technologies; robotics; safety |
| Index terms: | sustainable construction, exploratory factor analysis, developing country, manager, builder, survey, strategy, literature review, questionnaire, construction project, construction process, mapping, methodology, digital technology, quantity surveying, engineer, factor analysis, robotics, architect, construction professional, automation, implementation, construction industry |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, computing systems, profession, data collection methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, building construction, sustainable construction, development economics, professional development, automation and robotics, production management, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, International Construction, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here