Drivers for design for deconstruction (DfD) implementation among design professionals

Pittri, H; Agyekum, K; Botchway, E A; Alencastro, J; Oladinrin, O T and Dompey, A M A (2024) Drivers for design for deconstruction (DfD) implementation among design professionals. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(5), pp. 1134-1154. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: The design for deconstruction (DfD) technique, a contemporaneous solution to demolition by optimizing disassembly activities to enable reuse, has recently emerged with several promises to promote the circular economy. However, little attention has been given to its implementation among design professionals, especially in the Global South. Therefore, this study aims to explore the drivers for DfD implementation among design professionals in the Ghanaian construction industry (GCI). Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a mixed research approach (explanatory sequential design) with an initial quantitative instrument phase, followed by a qualitative data collection phase. Data from the survey were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, one-sample t-Test, and normalization value (NV) test after a review of pertinent literature. These data were then validated through semistructured interviews with ten design professionals with in-depth knowledge of DfD. Findings: The findings revealed that although all ten drivers are important, the eight key drivers for the DfD implementation were identified as, in order of importance, "Availability of computer software applications regarding DfD," "Inclusion of DfD in the formal education of design professionals," "Increasing public awareness of the concept of DfD," "Organizing workshops/seminars for design professionals on the concept of DfD," "Availability of DfD training," "Regulation regarding DfD," "Industry guidance regarding DfD" and "Establishing a market for salvaged construction components." Originality/value: This study's findings provide insights into an under-investigated topic in Ghana and offer new and additional information and insights into the current state-of-the-art on the factors that drive DfD implementation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction and demolition waste; design for deconstruction; design professionals; Ghana; questionaire survey; interview
Index terms: regulation, state of the art, methodology, disassembly, interview, survey, construction and demolition, construction industry, implementation, workshop, circular economy, Ghana, deviation
Subjects: Geography, sustainable design, research methods, political science, industry analysis, waste management, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, construction type, financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, operations management
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here