Rasheed, E O and Rotimi, J O B (2024) The green office environment: New Zealand workers' perception of IEQ. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(5), pp. 1240-1259. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: Achieving an appropriate indoor environment quality (IEQ) is crucial to a green office environment. Whilst much research has been carried out across the globe on the ideal IEQ for green offices, little is known about which indoor environment New Zealand office workers prefer and regard as most appropriate. This study investigated New Zealand office workers' preference for a green environment. Design/methodology/approach: Workers were conveniently selected for a questionnaire survey study from two major cities in the country – Wellington and Auckland. The perception of 149 workers was analysed and discussed based on the workers' demographics. The responses to each question were analysed based on the mean, standard deviation, frequency of responses and difference in opinion. Findings: The results showed that workers' preferences for an ideal IEQ in green work environments depend largely on demographics. New Zealand office workers prefer work environments to have more fresh air and rely on mixed-mode ventilation and lighting systems. Also New Zealand office workers like to have better acoustic quality with less distraction and background noise. Regarding temperature, workers prefer workspaces to be neither cooler nor warmer. Unique to New Zealand workers, the workers prefer to have some (not complete) individual control over the IEQ in offices. Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in the summer season, which could have impacted the responses received. Also the sample size was limited to two major cities in the country. Further studies should be conducted in other regions and during different seasons. Practical implications: This study provides the opportunity for more studies in this area of research and highlights significant findings worthy of critical investigations. The results of this study benefit various stakeholders, such as facilities managers and workplace designers, and support proactive response approaches to achieving building occupants' preferences for an ideal work environment. Originality/value: This study is the first research in New Zealand to explore worker preferences of IEQ that is not limited to a particular building, expanding the body of knowledge on workers' perception of the ideal work environment in the country.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | green indoor environments; New Zealand workspaces; workers' preferences; questionaire survey |
| Index terms: | New Zealand, workspace, sample size, deviation, indoor environment, designer, summer, work environment, investigation, demographics, ventilation, survey, methodology, green office, facilities manager, Wellington, questionnaire, body of knowledge, preference |
| Subjects: | demography, Geography, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, design practice, management, financial and cost management, knowledge management, environmental science, practitioner, climate science, research design and methodology, air quality, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here