Whittaker, J D (1970) A study of competitive bidding with particular reference to the construction industry. PhD thesis, City, University of London, UK.
Abstract
This thesis describes an operational research study applying decision theory and quantitative methods to the problems of competitive bidding. The study was provided with data and information by four English building construction companies. First a preliminary feasibility study was conducted which indicated that the potential for substantial benefits exists. Then the decision problem was formulated in a quantitative manner, which allows treatment of the variation due to estimating uncertainty, and of the constraining effect of resources. The Friedman model and some of the published variants were presented and discussed. This led to the development of i General Distribution decision model which incorporates managerial assessment of the competition into a probabilistic framework. This Model, four Friedman variants, and a feedback model were tested with data supplied by the participating companies. The sample was too small for the results to be conclusive but they did indicate that the basic Friedman Model and the General Distribution Model can equal or outperform actual company behaviour. Partial implementation of the General Distribution Model indicated that it may be practicable.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; competition; construction companies; decision theory; estimating; feasibility study; operational research; training; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | quantitative method, competition, variation, bidding, estimating, decision theory, competitive bidding, feasibility study, construction company, building construction, construction industry, implementation, operational research |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, building construction, decision analysis, market analysis, contractual condition, management, financial and cost management, bidding, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, design stages, organization |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Procurement, Design Practice, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here