Morris, P W G (1972) A study of selected building projects in the context of theories of organization. PhD thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK.
Abstract
This study examines the pattern of coordination and control at the Design-Construction interface on building projects under different conditions of project uncertainty and complexity. It does this in two stages: in a General Interface Analysis and in Comparative Project Analyses. Six projects having varying contractual conditions and with progressively early stages of contractor entrance are compared using concepts of organization theory, particularly that of the effect of differentiation upon the pattern of integration. Specific relationships between the factors of differentiation and the pattern of integration are tested at defined interfaces in the projects. This is the General Interface Analysis. It is shown that the type of coordinative mechanism is a function of the type of subsystem interdependence; that the make-up of the coordinating bodies is a function of the pattern of organizational and technological differentiation; and that the frequency of coordination is a function of the rate-of-change and degree-of-uncertainty of the project and its environment. The Project Analyses show how the basic s'tructure of the project c:onstrains its organizational flexibility. It is shown that coordination and control at the Design-Cons;truction interface are difficult not so much when its differentiation is large as when it is complex. For this reason, no overall effect of the individual dimensions of differentiation on the pattern of integration is observed. The conditions under which liaison bodies are used as integrating mechanisms between Design and Construction are discussed. Further, it is seen that, when programming expertise lies with the contractor, the early entrance of the contractor onto the project is vital in order to ensure an adequate appraisal of the implications of the design to the project programme. Finally, it is shown how problems of coordination and control hecome more severe as projects increase in size, speed or complexity. Ways of dealing with such situations are described.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; coordination; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | coordination, programme, programming, appraisal, integration, dimension, differentiation, project uncertainty, complexity, design and construction, interdependence |
| Subjects: | programming, project management theory and practice, health monitoring assessment and metrics, systems engineering, organization, organizational analysis, factor and component analysis, project controls, management, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Time Control, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Procurement, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here