Levy, R (1975) The concept of system identification and its application to the built environment. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
The thesis contains both general theoretical considerations and examples of applications of the theory. In Chapters 1, 2 and 3, the concept of system identification is developed in terms of the contextual and theoretical issues of holistic systems and the inherent complexity of holistic systems. Under these broad headings various specific concepts are studied. These include the scientific approach; the relationships among holism, atomism, realism, and idealism; the essential field of General System Theory; the relationship between complexity and simplicity; the processes of explaining and modelling the world or parts thereof; and detailed discussions on hierarchies and relationships. This results in three meta-models of the system identification process being developed and concludes with system identification being defined as an indeterminate process, which generates information in terms of learning based paradigms, which may then be instrumental in disciplining problem-solving pursuits. In Chapters 4 and 5 the system identification paradigm is expressed in terms of the identification of the built environment system. This identification process, which is ideological in nature, expresses the built environment in terms of three interacting elements; the Technostructure, the Technology, and the Socio-ecostructure. To parallel this exercise (which is characterized by a high level of generality) a second example, that of the identification of the Building Industry as a component of the built environment, is outlined. This identification highlights the socio-political interactions within the Building Industry and the responsibilities of the individual building technologist with respect to the environment, the society and himself.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; complexity; building industry; learning; building technologist |
| Index terms: | built environment, paradigm, building industry, building technologist, interaction, modelling, system-identification, realism, exercise, complexity, society |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, education and knowledge transfer, analytical methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here