Stubbs, D A (1975) Trunk stresses in construction workers. PhD thesis, University of Surrey, UK.
Abstract
The incidence of low back pain in the construction industry has been investigated. Industrial accidents, particularly those occurring during material handling, generally decreased with increasing age, but vary in incidence between different trades. Frequent high trunk stresses wore found in some of the common handling techniques, and this could well account for the associated frequency of trunk injuries. Stooping lifts are generally used at present, and it is clear that proper training in handling would reduce the hazards. To establish the basis of a training scheme for the industry, a series of laboratory studies were undertaken to compare trunk stresses in various lifting techniques when handling weights at different heights relative to the body. Semi knee lifting (lifting with the knees partially flexed) was least stressful, and lateral full stoop lifting produced the greatest stresses. Truncal stress increased with increasing load and lift height for all techniques, simultaneous increases, in lift height and load weight disproportionately increasing the truncal stresses observed. A field study was also undertaken to measure the energy demands -on an operative whon using the different lifting methods. The results demonstrated that semi knee lifts and semi stooping lifts use less energy than full stoop and full knee lifts. Likewise stoop lifts whether full or semi required lower energy expenditures than those observed during bent knee lifting. The differences observed were small, indicating that the bent knee lifting methods recommended should not lead to any material increase in fatigue at work.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fatigue; hazards; material handling; stress |
| Index terms: | energy-expenditure, energy demand, construction worker, construction industry, operative, fatigue, field study, laboratory, injury, material handling, lifting, back pain |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, research management, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, research methods, energy systems, product delivery, practitioner |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here