Factors affecting safety performance in large construction contractors in Egypt

Abdul-Rashid, I; Bassioni, H and Bawazeer, F (2007) Factors affecting safety performance in large construction contractors in Egypt. In: Boyd, D (ed.) Proceedings of 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2007, Belfast, UK.

Abstract

The interest in safety awareness among construction companies has greatly increased in the past decade. The ever-increasing cost of medical treatment and the potential for lawsuits can lead to higher insurance premiums, which in turn tend to have a negative impact on a company’s profit Safety in construction sites is a major concern in Egypt, and little research has been conducted on the subject. The objective of this paper is to identify the factors affecting safety performance in large construction companies in Egypt. Sixty three factors were identified from international literature and grouped into twelve major categories. A questionnaire survey was conducted on large construction contractors in Egypt and the collected data was analysed using an importance index to rank the safety performance factors. The rank concordance between the grades of companies was tested using Kendall’s coefficient, and the responses among grades were found to have high agreement. It was concluded that the most important factors affecting safety performance are safety awareness of company’s top management, safety awareness of project managers, and safety inspections.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractors; Egypt; health and safety; performance
Index terms: safety inspection, top management, insurance, questionnaire, construction contractor, Egypt, safety performance, project manager, health and safety, construction site, profit, survey, construction company
Subjects: organization, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, work location, economic analysis, management, Geography, health safety and environment, occupational health and safety management, quality assurance
Topics: Quality Management, Organizational Design, Site Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here