McCaffer, R (1976) Contractors' bidding behaviour and tender price prediction. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
Abstract
Data relating to the bids for 384 roads contracts and 190 buildings contracts and a library of individual unit prices were obtained. The normality or near normality of the distribution of bids for buildings and roads contracts is established. This allows the relationship between mean and lowest bids to be defined using normal order statistics. It also permits the application of outlier tests to be used in identifying unrealistically low bids. The average mean standardised bids of contractors have a strong negative correlation with the contractor’s success ratio. This allows contractors to predict success ratios of others using their mean-standardised bids. The data required for this is not limited to the competitions in which the contractor himself enters. Contractors have different behaviour patterns, some with disproportionate numbers of high or low bids and others behave randomly. These behaviour features correlate well with the average mean-standardised bids. Graphs of the cumulative sum of (bid-mean bid)/mean bid are useful in identifying contractors who are seeking work and those who are not. These can be used to identify serious rivals for particular contracts. Contractors have different sensitivity of success ratio to changes in bid value thus indicating different market judgements. Contractors also have different trends within their standardised bids to contract value. This only affects success ratios in extreme cases. Designers have accuracies of standard deviations of 17% and 20% for predicting the lowest bid of buildings and roads contracts respectively. Price models based on multiple regression analysis produce similar accuracies for comparable construction works. The tender price prediction system developed, based on a library of, untt prices and inflation indices achieved a standard deviation of 8.3% in predicting the mean bid and 11% in predicting the lowest bid for roads contracts. This could be improved with more data in the price library but nevertheless is a substantial improvement on the results achieved by designer’s estimating.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | behaviour; bidding; contractor; statistical analysis |
| Index terms: | statistics, construction work, deviation, statistical analysis, designer, multiple regression analysis, estimating, bidding, inflation, competition, tender price, accuracy |
| Subjects: | profession, mathematical modelling, operations management, data science, bidding, economic analysis, financial and cost management, tendering, professional development, market analysis, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here