Jowitt, P W (1978) Decision-making in civil engineering systems. PhD thesis, Imperial College London, UK.
Abstract
The synthesis of optimal designs and decisions in complex civil engineering systems has assumed great importance in the face of increasingly limited resources. Uncertainty and competing requirements have a complicating influence on this synthesis. The construction of a rationale to deal with these problems is the primary aim of this work. The assimilation of uncertainty requires an extensive study of the fundamentals of probability theory and leads to the maximum entropy formalism for generating prior probability distributions from incomplete data. The measurement of value using utility theory is discussed and the combination of uncertainty and value is achieved in a prescription for decision-making. The advocated prescription is that of maximising the expected utility. Illustration of the rationale and its elements is given in several examples. Common sense requires that the techniques of assigning probability measures be both self-consistent and mutually consistent within the chosen prescription. This consistency is achieved. A secondary aim of the work is to demonstrate that a systems approach can lead to insights into system behaviour. This is demonstrated by some applications to granular media, The work is specifically directed at the resolution of civil engineering systems but is in accord with the general theory of decision-making and comments on current differences of opinion are valid in this wider sense. The application of the rationale is not restricted, and this is reflected in the variety of the illustrations. In addition to an educative role the work offers some novel solutions to civil engineering problems. Suggestions for the future application of the rationale are presented.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | utility theory; civil engineering; civil engineer; measurement; uncertainty; probability |
| Index terms: | entropy, civil engineer, utility theory, face, decision-making, probability distribution, media, prescription, resolution |
| Subjects: | psychology, profession, economic theory, statistical analysis, thermal systems, conflict resolution, decision analysis, sociology, medical science and clinical practice |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here