Farid, F (1981) Fair and reasonable markup (FaRM) pricing model: A present value approach to pricing of construction contracts. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Abstract
While the construction industry accounts for slightly less than 10 percent of the Gross National Product (GNP), it is responsible for more than 17 percent of all business failures. Conventional pricing methods employed in construction appear to be the major causes of these economic problems. The Fair and Reasonable Markup (FaRM) Pricing Model follows the "maximizing equityholders' wealth" objective of the firm more closely than do the conventional pricing practices. The model adopts the following definition for the Markup which is considered as "Fair and Reasonable": The FaRM would be viewed as the markup which satisfies the Required-Rate-of-Return (RRR) of the contractor for the particular (or at least the general risk-class of) project at hand. The FaRM Pricing Model is based on reasonable, adequate, and easily accessible information, and will result in a Minimum Acceptable Price (MAP). The firm cannot accept the project at a price below this MAP, without damaging its financial position; i.e., diminishing the equityholders' wealth. Several methods of incorporating uncertainty into capital investment decisions are investigated. Various types of "sales taxes" are studied and a proper treatment is suggested in each case. It is shown that sales tax is generally far from negligible. The federal, state and/or local income taxes are combined into a single composite-income-tax rate. The "Before-Tax-RRR" and the "Tax-Adjusted-FaRM" methods of considering the effects of income taxes on the FaRM Pricing Model are discussed.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | uncertainty; income; capital investment; investment; pricing; failure; business failure |
| Index terms: | capital investment, business failure, construction industry, construction contract, income, pricing, composite |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, economic analysis, materials science, contract type |
| Topics: | Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here