West, L-J (1982) An investigation into the career choice and occupational perceptions of professional builders and quantity surveyors. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.
Abstract
Firstly, this study investigated the career choice of professional builders and quantity surveyors, including careers guidance, job qualities and drifting into these professions. Secondly, the occupational stereotypes and the work role self-perceptions of these professions were studied. A questionnaire, including a semantic differential measure of occupational stereotypes, was used. A total response of one hundred and fifty-six was obtained; this included ninety-five members of the building and quantity surveying institutions and sixty-one undergraduates. Another semantic differential questionnaire was completed by one hundred and seventy-four professionals to measure their work role self-perceptions. Cluster analysis, factor analysis and discriminant analysis were used to study the stereotypes and the self-perceptions. Seventy per cent of the individuals drifted into their profession, many with inadequate careers guidance. Entrants perceived their professions' work reasonably accurately being attracted by the most important and well provided for intrinsic aspects, The industry's poor image was increasingly important. Dependent occupational stereotypes and work role self-perceptions were found and were similar for both professions and career levels. Both professions saw themselves apart from their stereo- type of a member of their own profession, suggesting poor professional socialisation and misperceptions.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | careers; quantity surveying; builder; graduate; professional; quantity surveyor; cluster analysis; discriminant analysis; factor analysis |
| Index terms: | discriminant analysis, cluster analysis, undergraduate, profession, questionnaire, stereotype, professional builder, surveying, investigation, factor analysis, career, builder, quantity surveying |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, professional development, profession, health monitoring assessment and metrics, statistical analysis, sociology, practitioner, institututions, curriculum development, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Education, Information Management, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here