Yeo, K T (1982) A systems approach to cost management of large scale offshore oil projects. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
The main objectives of this thesis are to provide a systems synthesis of the various facets of project cost estimation and management and to suggest Improvements to the existing methods and philosophy with special references to offshore oil development projects. In seeking improved methods for cost estimation and control emphasis Is given to systems and cost modelling approaches.Large scale offshore oil projects are viewed as large scale systems which are characterised by structural complexity and environmental uncertainty. The problems of project organisational complexity can be reduced by applying the systems orientated technique of work breakdown structure (WBS) and work packaging. The work packaging approach allows the Implementation of the desired Integration of project cost, time, and resources (CTR).The CTR Integration can be best achieved through a computerised modelling system which provides a valuable management tool for rapid cost evaluation and sensitivity analysis. Complementary to the evaluation model, the development of macro cost estimating models and formulating of estimating algorithms using multiple regression analysis are demonstrated with historical data.For risk quantification, two useful techniques are discussed namely a PERT type estimating method and Monte Carlo simulation. Both techniques are capable of generating the necessary probability distribution of cost outcomes, which in turn forms a basis for contingency calculation.The PERT-type technique Is quasi-probabilistic in nature and It Is generally preferred for Its relative simplicity and practicality. It encourages range estimation based on historical data dispersion. And the management risk attitude and estimating confidence can also be expressed.The separation of the relatively non-controllable environmental variables from the controllable resources variables prompts the requirement of a two-tiered contingency management system. The derivation of the second tier contingency called the management reserves is proposed. Further works are also recommended especially referring to the need of using modelling approach for marginal oil and gas prospect evaluation and corporate planning.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Wootton, M E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; uncertainty; contingency; cost estimating; cost management; integration; project cost; cost modelling; multiple regression; probability; quantification; regression analysis; Monte Carlo simulation |
| Index terms: | sensitivity analysis, multiple regression analysis, environmental uncertainty, management system, oil and gas, management risk, philosophy, estimation, corporate planning, regression analysis, cost estimating, probability distribution, modelling, estimating, project cost, implementation, cost management, quantification, Monte Carlo simulation, complexity, integration, multiple-regression |
| Subjects: | economics, philosophical studies, modelling and simulation, industry analysis, systems engineering, financial and cost management, financial risk, analytical methods, business, management, contractual arrangements, measurement and scaling, organizational analysis, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, accounting and finance |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Governance, Procurement, Sustainability, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here