The development of school construction systems in Hertfordshire 1946-64

Keath, M (1983) The development of school construction systems in Hertfordshire 1946-64. PhD thesis, University of Greenwich, UK.

Abstract

Though no comprehensive study has been made of them previously, the post-war Hertfordshire Schools are well known for progressive design and for pioneering prefabrication on a large scale. In Part 1 the background to Hertfordshire's building programme is examined in the light of the 1944 Education Act and post-war population growth coupled with severe shortages of conventional building materials and labour. Part 2 explores Hertfordshire's response to this challenge: rejecting the use of war-time hutting for new primary schools, construction offering more permanency, and freedom to design a proper teaching environment was sought. A prototype was built and a vital process of "development," informing both construction and design, emerges as the key to progress. The process is shown to have begun with the adoption of a set of novel, but existing, building components; continuing analysis, modification and selective substitution led to the evolution of an integrated constructional system. Close collaboration with both clients and manufacturers ensured that optimum fitness-for-purpose in relation to cost was achieved. The interest created by this new type of architecture is discussed before turning, in Part 3, to its extension to the more complex needs of secondary schools and colleges. It is shown that once the approach was established the main challenge was organisational; alternative materials and modules, together with internal questionings of its validity in changing conditions, were all absorbed by the development process. The approach was emulated by others who introduced the consortium idea to ensure economical component manufacture; the period reviewed ends with the formation of the South Eastern Architects Collaboration (SEAC). It is strikingly clear that the influence of modernist architectural precepts, per se, was negligible. Yet by a remorseless objectivity of design the schools achieved, perhaps uniquely, the fullest realisation of Modern Movement principles, a matter of significance to architectural history.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction systems; education; population; schools; collaboration; prefabrication; teaching; architect; client; consortium
Index terms: prefabrication, war, architect, module, building material, alternative material, validity, consortium, history, construction system, shortages, building component, educational building construction, collaboration, population, evolution, prototype, secondary school, programme, manufacturer, movement
Subjects: materials science, practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, profession, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental science, economic analysis, architectural and construction history, modelling and simulation, building materials, conflict and crisis studies, architectural elements, management, project controls, demography, partnership management, educational institutions, building construction
Topics: Legal Issues, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Education, Time Control, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here