Lim, B T C (1987) Causal modelling construction project performance. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.
Abstract
This research concerns a quantitative examination of the causal effects of the antecedents of project performance. Congruous with a multivariate perspective, project performance has been conceived as a function of the external and site environments, the project site organisation-and-management and site personnel. The conception has culminated in a postulated partial causal model grounded on a priori conceptual-theoretical considerations. Verification of the causal model demands the testing of a network of eleven causal hypotheses using the path analytical technique. Mixed results have emerged with six causal hypotheses supported, one partially supported and the remaining four unsupported by data. The implications on policy decision making by site management have been considered. The assertion is that manipulative actions on the site integrative mechanism, on-the-spot task structuring and perceived site environmental uncertainty, conducted within a synergistical framework, would impart a cumulative promotory effect on project performance.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision making; performance; personnel; site management; site organisation; uncertainty; project performance |
| Index terms: | site management, personnel, construction project, environmental uncertainty, testing, decision-making, project performance, modelling, site organization |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, project management theory and practice, professional practice, construction operations, financial risk, management, analytical methods, production management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Site Management, Cost Management, Human Resources, Risk Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here