Shahbodaghlou, F (1987) A feasibility model for use of weather protection in cold region construction. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.
Abstract
Accounting for weather protection is an important part of the bid for cold weather construction projects, which can easily cut into the projected profit if underestimated. However, for lack of any better tool, this portion of the bid is often approximated by a guess. The author has developed a model to aid the contractor in making calculated decisions on the use and type of protection of his project during the winter. The decision model was created to investigate the economical feasibility and optimal type of cold weather protection at specific construction sites. To accomplish this task, the SLAM II simulation language (Pritsker and associates, W. Lafayette, IN. ) was selected as the core computer language. After considerable investigation a Triangular-Pert (Pert scheduling based on a triangular distribution) was chosen for this simulation. The schedule for a three-story office building with a basement was selected and simulated as an example. The first set of runs of this simulation was done without any weather-productivity adjustment. In the next set of runs, however, the daily weather information was input through a weather data generator. This weather generator, which is used as a subroutine function of the SLAM II program, then creates the necessary data to be used as input in the productivity subroutine function. This subroutines calculates the Cold Environment Efficiency Factor (CEEF), which is used to adjust the duration of each activity for cold weather impact. Comparing the adjusted figures to the original simulated durations, a third subroutine calculates the extra cost due to not enclosing the construction. This includes the additional labor cost and the liquidated damages (if any) incurred because of the overall project delay. At this point the cost of enclosing by five different protection systems and two heating systems (material, installation, operation costs included) was calculated. The list of systems presented are only an example and can easily be amended by other available systems by inputting additional basic information into the model. Once the second set of cost information is available, an economical study can be conducted to compare the alternatives and decide on the best.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Hancher, D E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | duration; efficiency; construction project; construction site; liquidated damages; productivity; scheduling; cost information; weather; simulation |
| Index terms: | program, construction project, weather, project delay, accounting, scheduling, winter, profit, liquidated damages, construction site, investigation, labour cost, cold weather, duration, heating system, cost information, efficiency, office building, productivity |
| Subjects: | climate science, data collection methods, construction type, air quality, environmental science, energy systems, economic analysis, work location, operations research, production management, contractual remedy, management, software systems, performance management, accounting and finance, cost management, project controls |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Construction Technology, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Time Control, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here