Asif, M (1988) Simple generic models for cost-significant estimating of construction project costs. PhD thesis, University of Dundee, UK.
Abstract
In this thesis, a new breed of hierarchical cost models is developed whose accuracy and complexity can be adjusted to suit the quality of data available at each stage of the design process. In their most detailed form, these models are as accurate as conventional ones but considerably simpler. The principle of cost-significance, which is used to derive the models, is explained. The models are based upon the finding that for defined project categories identical cost-significant work packages (CSWP) can be derived which contribute a constant fraction of the total project value. The techniques used to develop the models are described. A suite of cost models has been produced for three project categories; reinforced concrete bridges, major roads and trunk sewers. Each model comprises a few (no more than 27) CSWPs which need to be priced. The total value of the CSWPs is divided by an associated cost model factor to predict the total project value. The cost model factor represents the proportion of value contributed by the CSWPs. The ability of the models to predict total bill values was tested on virgin bills. The achieved accuracy was within ±7% (for two thirds of cases) at the detailed design stage and within ±8% (for two thirds of cases) at the feasibility design stage. The detailed model for bridges has been incorporated in a commercial estimating software package called BRIDGET. The software package is described. The variability of unit rates applied to cost-significant and non-cost-significant items (CSI) has been studied. Generally, unit rates applied to non-CSIs vary up to three times as much as unit rates applied to CSIs. Moreover, the difference in unit rates between similar CSIs is of no greater order than the typical fluctuations in rates expected from one tender to another in pricing a CSI. Since the CSWPs relate to the way costs are incurred on site the models can be used to compare estimated and actual costs and can provide an effective mechanism for feedback to estimators.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; commercial; complexity; estimating; feedback; pricing; reinforced concrete; sewers; unit rates; estimator; design process |
| Index terms: | software package, variability, construction project, design stage, unit rate, cost model, reinforced concrete, accuracy, estimating, actual cost, pricing, complexity, sewer, package, estimator, design process |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, systems engineering, design methods, financial and cost management, statistical analysis, professional practice, software systems, production management, professional development, infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements, profession, building materials |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Procurement, Information Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here