Anumba, C J (1989) An integrated two and three dimensional data structure for a structural engineering CAD system. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Abstract
The uptake of CAD in structural engineering has been low when compared with other engineering disciplines. A legacy of the low level of CAD usage is that many of the currently available systems originated outside the industry and, generally, do not adequately meet the needs of the structural engineer. These needs are re-evaluated within the context of a virtual RAM environment, and a set of corresponding user-requirements identified. It is argued that the key to addressing these lies in the underlying data structure of the CAD system. A prototype data structure is proposed based on new concepts. The prototype data structure seeks to provide an effective integration of 2D drafting and 3D modelling enabling both techniques to be applied to the greatest advantage. It is designed as a hybrid system composed of a hierarchical (graphical) data structure which is bound to an extensible quasi-relational (non-graphical) data structure. Other features of the data structure include its user-orientated nature, which makes it visible and manipulable by the designer, and its departure from the layering concept. It also employs a `dual view concept', which provides for mutual coordination of the physical and logical aspects of a design, and adopts a flexible and problem-oriented approach to the organisation of design information. Ease of use and the ability to work at a high level of abstraction are also key attributes. The concept of integration embodied in the design of the data structure permits four levels of integration to be addressed to varying extents: 2D drafting and 3D modelling; graphical and non-graphical data; the user interface and the data structure; and linkage of the system to other applications. The consistent philosophy of the data structure also provides for the incorporation of an efficient memory management system. Evaluation of the prototype data structure was based on two examples which are presented in the thesis. The examples served to demonstrate the above concepts which proved beneficial to the structural engineeer in many respects. The integration of these concepts into the design of CAD systems for structural engineering is recommended.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coordination; drafting; 3D modelling; CAD systems; integration; structural engineering; designer; structural engineer |
| Index terms: | integration, structural engineer, low level, designer, hybrid system, linkage, 3D modelling, coordination, drafting, data structure, key attribute, philosophy, management system, user interface, prototype |
| Subjects: | data science, profession, human-computer interaction, business, philosophical studies, systems and processes, management, computational design, technical documentation, modelling and simulation, risk assessment, organizational analysis, measurement and scaling |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here