Burrows, B G (1989) Organisation and quality of falsework construction: A socio-economic study of the organisational structure of the construction industry with respect to the falsework production process and the quality of workmanship attained. PhD thesis, University of Warwick, UK.
Abstract
The research attempted to relate quality of falsework erection to the organisation and competence of personnel involved. The study involved field investigation using a sample of fifty four sites throughout England And Wales where different types of falsework arrangements were being erected by a range of organisations and personnel. By the establishment of a rigorous method of evaluating quality of workmanship of falsework construction this was the first study which enabled quality standards to be compared across different types of falsework arrangements. In addition this study, combined with a sociological analysis, enabled an assessment to be made between organisation, competence and quality, which to the author's knowledge, has not been undertaken prior to this study. Subsequent analyses of the data, used the two models of organisation: the economic and occupational orders. These indicated that all sites essentially adopted the same methods and assumptions. Any attempts to formalise the management of the process of control of falsework, along the lines of the procedures outlined in the Code of Practice for Falsework, were limited in extent and their degree of success. The investigation found that the quality of falsework on building sites was generally of a lower standard than on civil engineering sites. This was found to be attributed to the competence of the manual workforce. This study addresses the organisation structure of the industry at large. Although peculiar, in that it leads to a temporary product, the falsework process may be regarded as a microcosm of the overall construction process. The conclusions presented in this thesis have relevance to the current issues of concern to the industry: competence, skill shortages, training and quality (including safety) and the implementation and efficacy of Quality Assurance schemes.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building site; civil engineering; competence; England; falsework; occupational order; personnel; quality assurance; safety; workforce; workmanship |
| Index terms: | production process, quality assurance, building site, occupational order, organizational structure, personnel, skill shortage, workmanship, Wales, competence, construction process, quality standard, England, construction industry, implementation, investigation, falsework |
| Subjects: | manufacturing engineering, management, personnel development, site and location studies, Geography, contractual condition, building construction, sociology, quality assurance, industry analysis, data collection methods, construction methods, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Site Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Human Resources, Procurement, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here