Finch, E F (1989) A requisite decision model for the selection of mechanical and electrical services in buildings. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.
Abstract
The role of mechanical and electrical services engineers in building design is increasingly one of 'decision maker' rather than conventional 'designer’. Much of the design effort occurs at the manufacturing stage, as witnessed by the proliferation of package units and modular fittings. The engineer is therefore engaged in major investment decisions. These concern innumerable technologies available from competing manufacturers and suppliers. An attempt is made in this thesis to define a formal decision model which will help decision makers make more judicious choices from these technologies. Any such decision model must consider three complicating features which enter into the equation; 1) the intangible outcomes, which cannot be expressed in monetary terms, that occur as a result of design decisions; 2) the strategic and uncertain implications of many design decisions, committing the user organisation to technologies which may or may not impair the long-term performance of that organisation; 3) the numerous user and operating groups affected by the decision. The methods used in the model try to reflect these issues. The model interrelates life cycle costing; multi-attribute utility theory; risk analysis and technological forecasting to this end. It is hoped that such a model will provide a vehicle for discussion and justification. In this way a design is arrived at which is not only compatible with the client's short-term needs, but also his/her long-term requirements.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | multi-attribute utility theory; building design; design decision; forecasting; investment; life cycle; performance; risk analysis; client; designer; supplier; life cycle cost |
| Index terms: | life cycle, life cycle cost, engineer, building design, services engineer, package, investment decision, costing, forecasting, risk analysis, design decision, designer, multi-attribute utility theory, manufacturer |
| Subjects: | decision-making and optimization, architectural design, research methods, prediction and forecasting, accounting and finance, economic analysis, profession, value management, contractual arrangements, practitioner, design practice, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here