Salamah, A A A (1989) COAD: A knowledge-based expert system for conceptual estimates and designs. PhD thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA.
Abstract
Current utilization of expert systems has resulted in more effective decision-making, which translates into savings in time and money. However, the field of estimation has not yet been brought within the range of this technology and so this research was conducted to explore the applicability of expert systems to building construction estimates. The research focuses on determining the essential rules and heuristics used by experts in the field in making conceptual cost estimates for the construction of buildings and then applying expert systems technology to the field of estimation. Since such rules and heuristics alone would be inadequate for producing a sound expert system without the rules and heuristics that generate basic preliminary design criteria. The expert system has been enhanced with graphic illustrations. Research methodology consisted of problem recognition, task definition, initial design, knowledge acquisition, and system maintenance. A sizable part of estimate management seems to comprise judgments and decisions. The exploratory nature of this study contributes to the practice of estimation field by providing estimators a convenient way to evaluate mutually exclusive design alternatives in reaching estimate options. Better management of cost estimation through the application of expert systems to construction cost could free millions of dollars annually in project costs alone. The expert system COAD can help solve the problem posed by the shortage of trained estimators and also amplify the abilities of these experts, sharing their expertise with others and functioning as a training tool every time it is used.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Diekmann, J E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction cost; cost estimation; training; expert system; project cost; estimator; heuristic |
| Index terms: | preliminary design, expert system, estimator, decision-making, project cost, building construction, cost estimating, option, estimate, cost estimate, research methodology, knowledge acquisition, savings, estimation, construction cost, heuristic, judgment |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, economic analysis, dispute resolution, profession, risk assessment, research design and methodology, student development, data management, building construction, decision analysis, design practice, economics |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Education, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here