Salter, M (1989) Planning systems for small firms. PhD thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
Abstract
A study was carried out into the planning practices of four small building firms through interviews and questionnaires. The techniques of systems analysis were used to model the information flows through the firms. These revealed the firms to suffer from problems of integration between planning and other functions. The breakdown of the work for one function often did not suit the purposes of others. Project data often had to be regenerated. The firms did not evaluate their performance systematically in a way that would be of benefit to future contracts. A specification for a new system was developed to eliminate these deficiencies and to take advantage of the power of the microcomputer. The system derived data from the estimate. A work breakdown structure allowed the integration of planning, targeting, progress reporting, reporting of hours, and valuations. The database of estimate operations was maintained through an analysis of timesheets. Information for the scheduling of materials and subcontractors could be derived from the resulting programme. The small firms problem of integrating the demands imposed by a fluctuating workload on a relatively inflexible labour supply was considered. The use of decision rules to resolve conflicts through the levelling of a multiproject schedule was investigated. A large number of rules were developed using a spreadsheet operating in conjunction with a planning package. These were tested on a number of prototype workloads and assessed by various criteria. After further development a consistently good rule was found. This rule, and that encoded within the planning software, were applied to the levelling of the workload of one of the collaborating firms at various stages of progress over a three month period. The new rule continued to perform well. The feasibility of deriving planning data direct from the estimate, and of using timesheet data both to update programmes and to evaluate performance was demonstrated. The firms' methods of materials procurement and handling were investigated. It was found that their collection of materials from suppliers was poorly organised.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Elliott, R O K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building firms; conflict; contracts; integration; interview; labour supply; materials; procurement; scheduling; subcontractor; supplier; systems analysis |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, integration, subcontractor, scheduling, systems analysis, specification, interview, programme, information flow, workload, prototype, project data, building firm, estimate, package, spreadsheet, database, labour supply |
| Subjects: | data management, project controls, organizational analysis, information systems, management, labour economics, contractual condition, operations research, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, data science, organization, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Time Control, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here