Bentil, K K (1990) A model approach for predicting commercial construction site accidents. PhD thesis, University of Florida, USA.
Abstract
Safety should be one of the most important concerns in the construction industry because accidents at construction sites cause deaths, personal injuries and economic losses, estimated by Levitt and Samelson to be $19.5-billion each year, nationally. In Florida, the Department of Labor and Employment Security reported that in 1985, 17,461 disabling injuries cost the construction industry over $127-million. These statistics, coupled with the spiralling rates of workers' compensation insurance and stricter Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations being proposed by national lawmakers, are indications that there is a need for enhancements that can increase the effectiveness of existing safety programs. The ability to predict accidents within the industry can help make existing safety programs more effective and construction sites safer. Historically, prediction of accidents in the construction industry, in general, has been difficult because of the lack of relevant data and a scientifically valid method. The objective of this research is to develop a methodology that will enable the construction industry to predict accidents. This dissertation presents a model approach for predicting construction site accidents. The identification of the most significant factors contributing to construction accidents will facilitate the accident prediction process. Therefore the critical subject of factor identification is discussed and a data collection scheme is developed. A comprehensive approach, simplified to facilitate practical application within the construction industry, is presented and illustrated with an accident prediction model developed from a case study using a data base of 1078 accident observations collected from 85 different projects in four Florida counties. This study should be of interest to construction engineers and contractors, owners and managers of construction projects, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, safety professionals and advocates, insurance companies and all who are concerned about the vital subject of improving safety on construction sites.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Herbsman, Z T and Paul, Y |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | security; insurance; employment; safety; case study; construction project; construction site; regulation; owner; professional |
| Index terms: | prediction model, safety programs, construction site accident, construction industry, injury, economic indicator, insurance, engineer, owner, construction project, effectiveness, compensation, regulation, occupational safety and health, dissertation, employment, commercial construction, construction site, case study, construction accident, statistics, manager, methodology |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, prediction and forecasting, performance management, occupational health and safety management, production management, industry analysis, economic analysis, dispute resolution, mathematical modelling, construction type, political science, health conditions and diseases, practitioner, management, sociology, data analysis and analytics, profession, data collection methods, health risk and incident analysis, work location, research methods |
| Topics: | Governance, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here