Kim, S (1990) Development of risk assessment decision support system for hazardous materials movement. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.
Abstract
The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation is conducting a study focusing on risk assessment associated with movement of hazardous materials, and determination of corresponding vulnerable areas in the state. A goal of this research is to make the hazardous material risk assessment an integral part of accident analysis and risk management functions in transportation agencies. To achieve these objectives, the authors developed an interactive, user friendly microcomputer package. The risk assessment model behind this package relies on the notion that data can be obtained easily and updated over time. This package, therefore, employs existing data on accident reports, traffic information, and geometric parameters that is transferred from a mainframe database to the microcomputer. The modelling framework consists of several modules: LEVEL, EDIT, INFO, ZOOM, ANALYZE, MITIGATE, PRINT, HELP, RESET, and QUIT Module. It employs a color coding of streets, municipalities, counties, and states for easy and clear interpretation. To enhance graphic display capabilities of the model, shape points are digitized for each network link. In the LEVEL module three different scales are defined ranging from a small scale county level to a large scale street level, namely, (1) County, (2) Municipality, and (3) Street. Any scale may be selected for analysis at any time in the procedure. All other modules are, then, performed on the basis of chosen scale. The EDIT module can be used for data input or investigating hypothetical changes in order to determine the best strategies for problem alleviation. Creating or deleting techniques are included to avoid redigitizing the whole map provided link geometries will be changed over time. Edited data can either be saved on diskette files or be used temporarily in memory without altering original files. The INFO module employs dialogue boxes with bar graphs or color shadow maps to facilitate depicting numeric values of input and output statistics. The ZOOM module allows the user to see the area in question in more detail. The ANALYZE module comprises the main part of this package. Two primary features include: (1) vulnerability and risk assessment at the macro level which provides a ranking of the most affected counties, municipalities and streets (Macro analysis), and (2) risk analysis at the micro level (i.e. street level) which determines corridors of least risk between fixed origins and destinations (Micro analysis). The MITIGATION module is provided for evaluation of mitigating measures. The HELP module uses pop-window techniques to provide quick information with minimal program disruption. The RESET module exits ZOOM module and resets screen. Finally, QUIT module shells out to DOS or exits the package.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Hobeika, A G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support; municipality; shells; traffic; risk assessment; risk management; risk analysis |
| Index terms: | municipality, risk analysis, mitigation, vulnerability, program, window, strategy, movement, maps, decision support, modelling, statistics, module, small scale, mitigating measure, risk management, risk assessment, database, transportation agency, package, geometry, material risk |
| Subjects: | software systems, spatial and geospatial analysis, management, architectural elements, financial risk, production management, decision analysis, data management, transportation engineering, environmental hazards, administrative law, mathematical modelling, risk assessment, health behaviours and lifestyles, analytical methods, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here