Reynolds, M F (1990) Facilities planning and construction internship. DEng thesis, Texas A&M University, USA.
Abstract
The Texas A&M University System Department of Facilities Planning & Construction is one of the largest university engineering organizations in the United States. It maintains engineering and construction capabilities to respond quickly and efficiently for the needs of the entire university system. The Department of Facilities Planning & Construction with a staff of approximately 61 engineers, engineering technicians, clerical staff and construction representatives, is administering approximately 40 active construction contracts totalling in excess of $200 million. Construction placement in FY91 is expected to exceed \$70 million. The emphasis for this internship was on engineering and construction in the Texas A&M University System. Proper engineering and construction methods have become increasingly important and a necessary function in the quest for quality construction completed on time and within budget. There are a host of reasons for this, most relating directly to the strict constraints placed on requirements, time and money. The cost of construction materials, labor, and equipment have soared and technology is rapidly changing the construction techniques and kinds of materials and equipment used. It is obvious that prudent engineering and construction methods are essential to attain successfully completed projects. Effective administration, engineering, scheduling, quality control and quality assurance are primary ingredients to effective engineering methods. Each is of practical concern to the organization and the intern. The purpose of this report is to document the experiences acquired during the internship and demonstrate that the objectives of the internship have been met.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Stukhart, G |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | equipment; quality assurance; quality control; scheduling; United States; construction method |
| Index terms: | quality assurance, construction material, scheduling, construction contract, United States, construction method, facilities planning, placement, internship, quality control, engineer |
| Subjects: | operations research, Geography, project delivery, design process, contract type, quality assurance, building construction, profession, professional development, building materials, management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Human Resources, Time Control, Geographical Context, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Information Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here