'Give the people homes!': Britain's multi-storey housing drive

Glendinning, M (1991) 'Give the people homes!': Britain's multi-storey housing drive. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Abstract

This account explains why, how, and at whose instigation, large numbers of multi-storey blocks (6 or more storeys) were built by municipalities across the whole of Britain within a few years, chiefly in the 1960s. The thesis begins with an introductory chapter which sets out the author's own values, outlines the method of investigation and presentation of evidence, and briefly surveys other recent accounts of this subject. These have mostly claimed that the decisions by municipal councillors to build high flats were substantially determined by outside influences, such as professional groups or building contractors. It is made clear that this thesis will contest this historical consensus that municipal decision makers were little more than puppets. The main text pursues this argument in a step-by-step manner through chronological and thematic discussion. Part I describes how high flats, previously a vehicle for avant-garde architectural design, were forcefully grasped in the 1950s by powerful municipal housing interests as a weapon to defend their building and patronage apparatus against a threat posed by a national, professional grouping: town and country planners, set on encouraging mass population 'overspill' from the municipalities. Part I evaluates the power and motivation of the municipal 'housing crusaders' against that of other groupings, such as Central Government or contractors: it is found that these councillors and supporting officers were the only group with both power and motive to force through the sharp policy change to multi-storey building. Part II tackles, indirectly, the question of how an unorchestrated, cumulative movement, springing not from external pressure and coordination but from the cities themselves, could have spread right across the country and produced such seemingly uniform results.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: architect; architectural design; building contract; coordination; government; motivation; multi-storey; policy; population
Index terms: motivation, survey, movement, housing, municipality, architectural design, population, evidence, motive, building contract, building contractor, coordination, planner, investigation, architect
Subjects: data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type, profession, contract type, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, psychology, management, design practice, demography, administrative law
Topics: Research Practice, Procurement, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here