Gonzalez-Quevedo, A A (1991) Sensitivity analysis of construction simulation. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.
Abstract
In developing the CYCLONE methodology for simulating cyclic construction processes, a number of simplifying assumptions were made in order to provide a simple tool to be used by the construction personnel. It is the interest of this thesis to investigate if some of these simplifying assumptions have a significant effect in the results obtained from simulating a process using the MicroCYCLONE program. The three CYCLONE simplifying assumptions studied in this dissertation are: the simulation does not take into account the duration of a workday; an equipment breakdown is modeled using probabilistic branching, which is associated to an activity in the network where the equipment is being used; resources do not have attributes (e.g., equipment capacity, travel time as a function of capacity) associated to them. In order to investigate how these assumptions affect the simulation results, models are developed using the SLAM II methodology. SLAM II provides a simulation environment where each of the three simplifying assumptions can be removed from the models. The results obtained from the SLAM II models are compared against those obtained with the CYCLONE models. Two values in the results are looked at to provide a basis for comparison. They are the productivity of the process and the amount of time required to produce a given number of completed units. Two of the simplifying assumptions hold their validity when one takes into account that construction simulation results do not have to be extremely precise. These assumptions are: there is no need to take into account the workday duration in the simulation, and the resources can be modeled without associating any attributes to them. The assumption that equipment breakdowns can be modeled using probabilistic branching does not hold its validity. The results obtained when the equipment breakdown is modeled using a separate network, where the breakdown is associated with the equipment's own time distribution differ from the results predicted by MicroCYCLONE. The use of probabilistic branching is not an adequate way to model equipment breakdowns, unless a relationship is established between the equipment's utilization and the probability of the associated with the breakdown branch.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Halpin, D W |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | duration; personnel; equipment; productivity; probability; simulation |
| Index terms: | methodology, construction process, program, construction personnel, sensitivity analysis, construction simulation, personnel, duration, dissertation, validity, productivity, cyclone |
| Subjects: | modelling and simulation, research dissemination and communication, evaluation and assessment methods, workforce, climate science, project controls, building construction, environmental hazards, management, research methods, software systems |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management, Time Control, Human Resources, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here