Al-Hajj, A N (1991) Simple cost-significant models for total life-cycle costing in buildings. PhD thesis, University of Dundee, UK.
Abstract
In this thesis a number of simple cost models are presented for calculating the total life-cycle cost in buildings. The models embody the principle of cost significance, thereby focusing management effort on the high cost items, and reducing the effort involved in data collection analysis. The models are based on the findings that for defined building categories identical cost-significant items can be derived which contribute a constant fraction of the total life cycle expenditure. The techniques used to develop the models are described. Cost models have been developed for running costs (defined as operation plus maintenance costs), and maintenance costs using historical buildings data records, and tested on virgin data from similar types of buildings. Three building categories have been analyzed: teaching, residential, and laboratory buildings. The cost models calculated the total cost of running expenditure to an average accuracy of ±1.5%, ±3.5%, and ±2.6% for teaching, residential and laboratory buildings respectively. The cost models for maintenance costs calculated the costs to an average accuracy of ±4%, ±7%, and ±6.5% for the same three categories. When combining all categories the total cost was calculated to an accuracy of ±5% using the running cost model, and ±7% using the maintenance cost model. Typically, in running cost models, only 11 cost items have to be priced; in maintenance cost models only 18 items are needed. This represents a significant simplification over traditional techniques. An associated cost model factor was derived for each cost model to calculate the total cost of any building's running and maintenance expenditure. Since the models highlight a small but important number of items, the models will facilitate the prediction of life-cycle costs, and the collection of information on running costs in buildings. Thus, better feedback of information can be provided to the design stage. Furthermore, designers' attention will be directed to those areas of cost-significance, and provide a means to choose between alternatives when deciding on building investment. Further improvements to the models as well as recommendations for future work are suggested.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; feedback; improvement; investment; life cycle; residential; running costs; teaching; designer; cost significance |
| Index terms: | design stage, costing, simplification, cost model, designer, life cycle, laboratory, accuracy, cost significance, building investment, maintenance cost, running cost, historical building |
| Subjects: | financial management, asset management, research management, accounting and finance, construction type, management, financial and cost management, professional practice, professional development, value management, profession |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here