Slaughter, E S (1991) "Rapid" innovation and integration of components: Comparison of user and manufacturer innovations through a study of residential construction. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
Abstract
According to conventional wisdom, builders of residential housing almost never innovate. In a detailed field-based study of the residential construction industry, I document quite a different picture: builders, rather than the manufacturers of products and materials, are the developers of almost all of the innovations in a sample (n = 34) researched in depth. Through structured interviews with over 50 individuals in the industry, I collected specific data on a sample of 34 innovations relating to a single technology in residential construction, the stressed-skin panel. As background for this detailed analysis, I also collected a sample of 117 innovations that are permanently installed in a residential building. Measurement and comparison of economic incentives operating on builders and manufacturers in this industry show how a pattern of builder innovation can make economic sense. Builders develop needs for innovations in the middle of construction work, and at that time the cost of delay is very high. They must also integrate varied components into a whole operational residential structure. Under these conditions builders find innovation to be cost-effective; as a result, they rapidly innovate. The prevalence of these innovations indicates a de factor design partnership between these builder-users and manufactures.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Hippel, E v and Moavenzadeh, S F |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | measurement; residential; integration; partnership; innovation; builder; developer; interview |
| Index terms: | partnership, residential construction, residential building, manufacturer, integration, economic incentive, construction work, interview, builder, residential housing |
| Subjects: | partnership management, operations management, data collection methods, practitioner, construction type, organizational analysis, economic analysis, construction integration |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Organizational Design, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here