Bridgewater, C (1992) A new approach to the design of buildings for automated construction. PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK.
Abstract
Decreasing productivity from an ageing workforce, and a rising number of injuries suggest that robots could be used to enhance or replace human beings on building sites. While past research concentrated on the automation of current construction tasks, this work argues that building processes must be re-designed to suit robotics, flexible manufacturing (FMS), and computer-aided design (CAD). Such an approach is necessary because the number of young people joining the industry is dwindling, while discerning clients are demanding buildings which cost less to erect and are easier to maintain. It is possible to rationalise the design and construction of a building, so that modern manufacturing techniques enhance the creativity of human designers. Robots are more effective if they handle solid rather than fluid materials, so industrialised building systems are ideal platforms for construction automation. Using this basic premise, a kit of parts was embodied in CAD software, and used to design high-tech offices of up to three storeys. Furthermore, the components strongly influenced the design of the automation systems required to handle them. This research explores the advantages of using component-based building systems to underpin efforts in construction automation. It is also shown that the principles of `Design for Automation' must be applied if current levels of productivity are to be maintained. Furthermore, the implementation of off-site automation (in the form of Computer-Aided Design and factory-based methods of production) is shown to be easier when dealing with well-defined component-based building systems. Finally, it is demonstrated that no efforts in construction automation can afford to de-couple on-site processes from those that happen off-site.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; building process; building site; computer-aided design; creativity; industrialised building; manufacturing; off-site; productivity; robotics; site process; workforce; client; designer |
| Index terms: | designer, automated construction, productivity, industrialized building system, creativity, platform, site process, automation, industrialized building, implementation, robotics, design and construction, building system, building site, injury, building process, design of building, computer aided design |
| Subjects: | operations management, contractual arrangements, computational design, profession, engineering systems, health conditions and diseases, building construction, innovation and creative processes, management, building design, automation and robotics, digital design, site and location studies |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here