Abou-Zeid, A M K (1993) Data flow identification to support project automation/integration and productivity. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA.
Abstract
The Architecture-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry is characterized as being highly fragmented. A large number of diverse organizations participate in the planning, design, and construction of each constructed project. Cooperation between project participants is essential in order to achieve the primary objective of a project--to deliver a constructed facility. This cooperation necessitates the transfer of large quantities of project information. Communication is the means for information and data exchange between participants. Availability and timeliness of data needed to perform a given task decreases the potential for project delay(s) and rework thus, increasing productivity. This dissertation primarily investigates the existing communication activities in a construction project environment. The main objective of the dissertation is to identify data that are shared between the various project participants. A data flow analysis technique, known as "Structured Analysis," is used to develop a structured specification of the project communication system. An overview of the Structured Analysis methodology is provided. Data flow diagrams (DFDs), data dictionary (DD), and transform descriptions (TDs) that comprise tools for implementing structured analysis are described with emphasis given to DFDs. The ease of use, simplicity, and flexibility are among the factors that make DFDs an effective tool to document the communication process and depict shared-data in a construction project. The scope of this dissertation is limited to utilizing DFDs to study and document the communication process in a construction project environment. The resulting set of DFDs as well as the data dictionary are provided. The DFDs will provide participants with a guideline of what data they need to perform a specific task and where to get those data. This research also provides a framework for tracking and documenting the information flow between construction project participants. It also provides a framework for identifying communication problems using DFDs and data-participant matrices. Some communication difficulties among project participants are highlighted. Potential areas of modifications and/or automation are discussed. Additionally, questions related to the shared-data resource that uses automation technology to increase project productivity are raised. Recommendations for future studies are presented.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Russell, J S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project; automation; communication; productivity; flexibility; future studies |
| Index terms: | productivity, dictionary, data exchange, dissertation, automation, future study, rework, information flow, specification, project communication, cooperation, project delay, construction project, integration, methodology |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, data exchange, automation and robotics, production management, contractual condition, professional development, organizational analysis, project controls, data management, information systems, research dissemination and communication, research design and methodology, psychology, operations management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here