Birnie, J W (1993) A behavioural study using decision analysis of building cost prediction by chartered quantity surveyors. PhD thesis, Ulster University, UK.
Abstract
Previous behavioural research has shown that human beings are often poor in making good probability assessments and that the quality of these judgments is affected by human bias. In quantity surveying, considerable research has been carried out into the accuracy of building cost predictions but little is known about how the quality of these is influenced by the behavioural characteristics of the Chartered Quantity Surveyor when making them. This thesis describes a research investigation using a group of Chartered Quantity Surveyors into their predictive abilities and behavioural biases in both general event and building cost event situations. The key findings were: 1 - In relation to general events, Chartered Quantity Surveyors behaved much like other groups with a large number of the responses (surprise answers) capturing the true value in the extreme fractiles of their assessments. 2 - In relation to building events the results showed little improvement with again a large number of surprise answers, although with those excluded there was a good level of prediction. 3 - There appears to be a reasonable correlation within individuals between predictive ability in general and ability in building costs. 4 - Chartered Quantity Surveyors are generally in agreement that confidence in prediction of building cost events increases with monetary value and that this correlation is even stronger when the complexity of the item is also considered. 5 - Differences between traditional single point estimating and probability range estimating suggested that the latter would have an expected monetary value approximately 2% higher. 6 - The investigation into biases found evidence for a number, particularly overconfidence in specific situations, lack of appreciation of randomness, inability to handle two variables together, and lack of compliance with probability rules. Differing consequences of the application of anchoring and adjustment bias and examples of ignoring information because of the availability bias also occurred.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; bias; complexity; estimating; quantity surveyor; probability |
| Index terms: | surveying, decision analysis, accuracy, compliance, complexity, quantity surveying, evidence, cost prediction, estimating, bias, judgment, investigation |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, financial and cost management, probability and distributions, systems engineering, professional development, health safety and environment, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, dispute resolution, profession, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Cost Management, Legal Issues, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here