Cockerill, J E (1993) The construction industry in belfast 1800-1914. PhD thesis, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
Abstract
This thesis examines the construction industry in Belfast during the nineteenth century. A broad definition of construction is used, which includes speculative development, building and civil engineering contracting, and building supply. The development of professional groups and the contractual basis of contracting are also examined. This study shows that there were a number of differences between the industry in Belfast and the image of construction presented in previous studies. Property development and housebuilding in Belfast were generally efficient, especially in the provision of low-cost terraced housing. Urban development was assisted by the ready availability of land, whilst council bye-laws regulated the construction of most houses. Speculative builders and building construction and both types of building firm were larger and survived longer than other studies have indicated. Construction activity, especially new building work, fluctuated in Belfast, but the impact on firms was moderated by the range of activities they undertook. These included jobbing, speculative building, building contracting, civil engineering contracting, specialist sub-contracting and building supply. Competition lowered costs without reducing standards. Most construction work utilised contracting procedure, which introduced an element of quality control provided by Belfast's architects, civil engineers and quantity surveyors. By the 1840s most construction work in Belfast was designed and supervised by professionally trained individuals. The supply of building material was efficiently organised both by specialist firms and by building firms. Technical developments in brickmaking and the processing of timber and stone reduced construction costs. The nature of construction work changed to meet the needs of the industry's clients and stimulated developments in professional practice, in contracting and in construction technology. Change, organisational and technical, became a feature of Belfast's construction industry during the nineteenth century.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building contract; building firms; civil engineering; competition; construction cost; construction technology; housebuilding; new build; property development; quality control; standards; sub-contracting; urban development; architects; builder; civil engineer; client; professional; quantity surveyor |
| Index terms: | competition, housing, professional practice, builder, civil engineer, building construction, building firm, construction work, urban development, architect, building material, housebuilding, construction technology, land, property development, quality control, construction industry, building contract, quantity surveying, new build, sub-contracting, construction cost, construction activity |
| Subjects: | construction integration, economic development, professional development, urban design, building construction, market analysis, industry analysis, contract type, digital engineering, organization, construction type, profession, practitioner, operations management, building materials, real estate economics, project delivery, financial and cost management, construction operations |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here