Aliero, B A (1994) Utilisation of environmental impact assessment technique in the assessment of impact of human interference on natural ecology of estuaries: a case study of Mersey Estuary. PhD thesis, University of Salford, UK.
Abstract
A conceptual study of the impacts of human activities on the natural ecology of estuaries was carried out. The Mersey Estuary was used as a case study. Environmental Impact Assessment Techniques (EIA) was used to identify and evaluate impacts generated by various activities of man on estuaries. The study was conducted with materials and data gathered from scientific papers, documents, reports and other related literature sources. The findings of the research reveal that estuaries exist in several forms and shape. They are characterised by graded salinity ranging from marine condition (3.5%) to fresh water (0.05%) and periodic and spontaneous tidal movements. Estuaries are highly productive ecosystems and support large wildlife and fish. For many years, man has exploited estuarine resources. However, in the last 200 years, the advent of the industrial revolution led to dramatic growth of navigation and establishment of industries close to estuarine waters. Consequently, estuaries attracted large human populations which discharged sewage along with industrial effluent direct into their waters causing rapid deterioration in water quality and severe distress of the biota. The Mersey Estuary is typical of such industrialized estuaries. The level of engineering modification and the extent of pollution witnessed in the estuary is possibly unparalleled by any other estuary in the UK. These activities have significantly affected the ecosystem of the Mersey and the socioeconomic life of people living within its catchment boundary and beyond. EIA has become an important tool in environmental planning and management. I have used its principles and techniques in the identification and analysis of impacts caused by activities of man on the Mersey Estuary. Analysis of results indicate that the construction of training wall along the sea channels and the building of the Manchester Ship Canal were most important, reducing estuarine capacity and the stabilization of the inner estuary navigation channel. The heavy organic load from sewage and industry discharged directly into the estuary caused severe deficiency of dissolved oxygen and consequent loss of fish and wildlife. The drive to clean up the Estuary started in the 1970s and so far positive changes are being recorded showing improved wildlife which reflect general improvement in the whole estuary.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; document analysis; environmental impact assessment |
| Index terms: | ecology, fresh water, document analysis, environmental impact assessment, pollution, case study, distress, human activity, stabilization, water quality, sewage, movement, canal, deterioration, salinity, documents, population, scientific paper |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, professional development, water management, sociology, demography, environmental health, occupational health, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, health behaviours and lifestyles, waste management, environmental impact, economic analysis, material degradation and durability, data science, environmental science |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here