Quantifying benefits of electronic technology applied to bulk materials management

Back, W E (1994) Quantifying benefits of electronic technology applied to bulk materials management. PhD thesis, Clemson University, USA.

Abstract

There is a need within the industrial construction industry to comprehensively evaluate emerging technologies for electronic information management to determine their potential for enhancing the business processes defining the materials management functions. Establishing and maintaining a strategic advantage in a globally competitive business environment requires focus on technologies which facilitate work flow automation and process reengineering. Corporate implementation of electronic data management technologies such as integrated data bases, electronic data interchange, and bar coding should result in an improved materials management process characterized by higher levels of productivity, fewer processing errors, compressed durations and cycle times, and the formation of strategic customer-supplier partnerships. Effective implementation of these electronic data management technologies requires a strategic, innovative and cooperative approach to electronic document management and customer-supplier relationships. This frequently results in significant modifications to traditional industry procedures for materials management. To date, a methodology for quantitative analysis of time and cost benefits attributable to electronic data management technologies has been difficult to structure due to the complexity of predicting the subsequent organizational changes. Additionally, implementation of technologies such as these will impact work task durations and resource requirements. Without a technique for accurate quantitative prediction of technology benefits, cost justification of electronic data management innovation is considered for concurrent implementation. This research develops a methodology for quantifying the time and cost benefits attributable to implementation of electronic data management technologies applied to the materials management process. Data directly provided from leading engineering/construction companies are incorporated into four generalized materials management process models, each representing a distinct level of corporate information integration. By using a process of computer simulation, it is possible to quantitatively determine and measure the time and cost impacts of technology implementation. The research shows that the process benefits attributable to electronic data management are significant. Total reduction in cycle time for materials management was equivalent to 85% when electronic technologies were fully exploited to effect work flow automation and process reengineering. Similarly, process cost was reduced by 75%.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: complexity; duration; partnership; automation; data management; electronic data interchange; information management; innovation; integration; materials management; productivity; supplier; organizational change; simulation; quantitative analysis
Index terms: methodology, integration, quantitative analysis, complexity, materials management, organizational change, computer simulation, construction company, emerging technology, automation, duration, implementation, industrial construction, competitive busines, information integration, electronic data interchange, partnership, data management, productivity, electronic data management
Subjects: research methods, management, automation and robotics, building construction, partnership management, organizational analysis, data management, project controls, information systems, systems engineering, business, organization, operations management, modelling and simulation, innovation and technology management, business management, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here