Kumar, A (1994) Development of a model for determining workzone illumination requirements during nighttime highway construction. PhD thesis, University of Florida, USA.
Abstract
With the increasingly popularity of nightwork on many highway construction projects, a number of complex problems have been introduced in highway rehabilitation. Of many issues involved, workzone lighting is found to be the single most important factor affecting quality, safety, cost and productivity on these night projects. At present, lighting requirements in the workzones are minimally defined in the specifications of few state highway agencies and often times are not formally designed as there is no standard or guidelines to go by. Although a number of research studies have been performed in roadway lighting and industrial lighting area, no formal study determining illumination requirements in the workzones has been conducted. In this research effort an attempt has been made to identify the typical highway construction tasks performed at night and the factors affecting illumination requirement to adequately conduct these operations, and to develop a model determining average maintained light intensity levels for the tasks. In an effort to provide an overview of nighttime highway construction and provisions for lighting, an extensive literature review was conducted. As a result of nationwide questionnaire survey, various highway operations commonly performed at night were identified. Significant factors influencing illumination requirements for workzone lighting were also identified. These factors included: (a) speed, (b) accuracy or importance, (c) reflectance, (d) seeing distance, and (e) size of object. These factors were assigned certain subjective levels for comparing with visually similar outdoor industrial tasks. Various illuminance level categories were determined based on IES and OSHA recommendations, state provisions, opinions of experts and experiences during field reviews. The categories were intended to be interpreted as recommended safety requirements and not regulatory minimum requirements. A model approach was adopted to determine illumination levels for any given construction task. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the association of various factors with illumination requirement. Trial models were suggested and analyzed using SAS procedures. The most appropriate model was selected and validated using three real life case studies. For all the case studies which represented most commonly performed highway construction tasks at night, the results conformed to the field recorded values. From the opinions of the crew at the job-site and experiences while recording the observations, it was concluded that the results from the model were in agreement with the findings.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ellis, R D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; highway; rehabilitation; safety; productivity; case study; questionnaire survey; construction project; specification |
| Index terms: | survey, accuracy, literature review, specification, agency, questionnaire, construction project, correlation analysis, productivity, case study, illuminance, highway construction |
| Subjects: | building performance, sociology, statistical analysis, civil engineering, management, professional development, production management, contractual condition, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Contract Administration, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here