Martin, L and Root, D (2007) Reflections and observations on the use of broad-based survey methods on the South African construction sector. In: Boyd, D (ed.) Proceedings of 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2007, Belfast, UK.
Abstract
The choice of appropriate methods of data collection is crucial for empirical research. This choice often appears to be influenced by the previous experiences and traditions of a researcher and his/her environment. Furthermore, critical and reflective reporting on the application of data collection methods in context specific literature is far and few between and often do not address particular issues interesting to a particular research field, such as construction, and its setting, such as South Africa where historically few broad based surveys of the South African construction industry have been attempted. In December 2006 a telephonic, computer assisted, survey was conducted on a sample of 528 contractors registered with South Africa’s Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB). The data captured was quantitative but was supplemented with qualitative data. Although a good response rate was obtained, a number of context specific issues emerged ranging from problems with language to marriage proposals made to the female research staff. Of particularly note were the differences within the sample reflecting cultural, linguistic, economic and regional variations that affected the attitudes of respondents to the CIDB, the research and the interview process itself. From this conclusions are drawn that may assist researchers in research practice in South Africa and other developing countries.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | emerging contractors; methodology; smme; South Africa; survey |
| Index terms: | research practice, variation, methodology, reflection, construction industry, South Africa, construction sector, proposal, developing country, interview, survey, construction industry development |
| Subjects: | project planning, research design and methodology, data collection methods, industry analysis, research methods, professional development, development economics, contractual condition, Geography |
| Topics: | Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Contract Administration, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here