Minato, T (1994) A methodology for project risk control: A work package-based approach using historical cost control data. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Abstract
This research focuses on the issues of risk arising from multiple projects undertaken by a single company. Projects are dependent on a number of risk factors that interact in complex ways and that make the outcome of a project uncertain. In these cases, it may be possible for contractors to manage these risks by choosing corporate-level management strategies. By bearing these considerations in mind, this thesis develops a risk analysis methodology to serve as a support for managers analyzing a project's risks; responses can be for the specific project only or across many projects. The methodology in this thesis is built on the work breakdown structure (WBS) of a project, in which a project is defined as a portfolio of its component work packages. A single-index, linear model is then developed to estimate the uncertainty of a work package, which depends on the basic concept of the market model in financial portfolio theory. The key parameter of the developed model is beta, which is a regression coefficient relating the performance of a work package to the overall performance of completed projects. The beta estimates the co-variance among work packages, or a portion of project risk that arises from common risk factors to projects. Moreover, it is used to predict the change in profile of a project's uncertainty when risk-control is evaluated; estimating the value of controlling a risk is a principal contribution of this research. This methodology is uniquely formulated in that the risk is estimated only with the components in WBS and the associated cost information, instead of relying on external, explanatory variables. Such a model, built with rigorous statistical inference, provides a systematic and reliable approach for project risk analysis. In practice, it not only facilitates the knowledge acquisition process, but it also considerably reduces the cost of information. Thus, the application of this methodology will be of great valuable to both industry and the academic community.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ashley, D B |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | market; uncertainty; estimating; risk analysis; cost information; risk analysis |
| Index terms: | manager, risk analysis, estimating, methodology, cost control, management strategy, variance, cost information, package, estimate, project risk analysis, risk factor, knowledge acquisition |
| Subjects: | financial risk, management, accounting and finance, research methods, environmental hazards, student development, measurement and scaling, practitioner, contractual arrangements, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here