Pugh, T E (1994) Design-construction interface performance on traditional capital improvement projects. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Abstract
Overall project performance is highly dependent on performance at the design-construction interface. Successful transition of the project from design conception into physical reality requires that design and construction teams effectively deal with such interface issues as: differing site conditions, constructability, operability, material shortages, systems' interference and design errors and omissions. Failure to deal effectively with these interface issues will result in change orders and cost and schedule overruns. This dissertation is one of the first research studies to examine the relationship between project performance and the design-construction interface. The design-construction interface issues and their effect upon change order performance are investigated with an inductive research methodology by using available project information. Requests for information (RFI) and change orders were collected from three projects similar in scope but with vastly differing performance evaluations. The RFIs are comparatively analyzed to determine the underlying design-construction interface issues. Trends in the relationships between project performance and the interface issues are examined for potential hypotheses. The RFI-related change orders are studied in depth to assess their ability to predict in advance total change order cost escalations and schedule delays. The relationships between the design-construction interface issues and project performance are investigated by statistical analysis of several cross-classification tables using the chi-squared test of independence. An indexing system for predicting final change order cost and schedule performance from analysis of the project RFIs is proposed, developed and demonstrated using the data from the three projects.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | O'Connor, J T |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constructability; failure; performance evaluation; construction team; project performance; statistical analysis |
| Index terms: | design error, interface issue, schedule delay, schedule overrun, change order, statistical analysis, construction team, research methodology, project performance, design and construction, dissertation, indexing, constructability, schedule performance, improvement project, performance evaluation, shortages, cost escalation |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, project delivery, contractual arrangements, professional practice, data science, research design and methodology, research dissemination and communication, project controls, systems engineering, information systems, economics, construction integration, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, contractual condition, production management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Design Practice, Quality Management, Time Control, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here