Jimoh, R and van Wyk, J (2013) Ideological leaning and praxis of housing co-operatives in South Africa: Matters arising. Construction Economics and Building, 13(2), pp. 54-66. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Social movements came about as a result of dissatisfaction felt by society from the status quo. The grievances are presented through demonstrations, strikes, riots, occupation of land, boycott of business or by the development of social and economic alternatives such as self-help schemes or saving clubs. In South Africa, people join housing co-operatives because it takes a long time to wait for the Reconstruction Development Project (RDP) houses promised by the Government. The leaning of 5 housing co-operatives was examined within the context of ideology and praxis that are components of triad model. This was done through a multi-case study whereby the chairpersons of the housing co-operatives were interviewed using structured interview format. Findings from the study indicated that the housing co-operatives were not all open and voluntary; also, the housing co-operatives were not administered the same way. In all, efforts were put in by the housing co-operatives in engendering the ideology of co-operatives on one hand and the government on the other hand to provide the necessary subsidy so that the gap in the housing deficit could be bridged.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | co-operatives; housing; ideology; praxis; principles; South Africa |
| Index terms: | praxis, occupation, land, South Africa, operative, housing, reconstruction, interview, subsidy, case study, movement, society |
| Subjects: | reflexivity, Geography, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, data collection methods, construction type, communities and social development, economic analysis, building construction, sociology, real estate economics |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here