Smith, S D (1994) Production estimation of earthmoving operations using a discrete-event simulation model. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
"The earthmoving industry in the UK is described with reference to the major changes in emphasis over the past few decades. The sites that were chosen for study are described and the method of data collection outlined. A determinate model is developed. This is solved using a spreadsheet and the term match factor, indicating the efficiency of an earthmoving operation, is introduced. The disadvantages of the determinate model are discussed with the main conclusion that the variability in the earthmoving plant s working rates means that the production cannot be calculated accurately by determinate methods. A model is the developed based on the discrete-event models used to evaluate queueing systems. This model was initally tested on a computer spreadsheet but a dedicated program, in C, was later written. Discrete-event simulation requires the generation of random numbers and emphasis is placed on the determination of the probability distributions that accurately represent the real distributions of plant cycle times. A three stage validation process was used which involved both the acceptance from experts of the modelled system (which was obtained both in the UK and the United States) and also the ability of the model to determine accurately the production of observed operations. The simulation model could then, once validated, be used as an experimental platform. Experiments on actual operations have indicated which of the input factors to an operation the output is most sensitive to. They have shown that the correct number of trucks and maximisation of the leader working rate is essential to efficient earthmoving."
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | discrete-event simulation; earthmoving; production estimation |
| Index terms: | program, probability distribution, maximization, experiment, United States, platform, efficiency, estimation, earthmoving, validation, spreadsheet, variability |
| Subjects: | Geography, data collection methods, data science, algorithms, construction operations, statistical analysis, financial and cost management, software systems, professional development, digital design, performance management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Digital Applications, Information Management, Quality Management, Site Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here