Yaworsky, R A (1994) Risk planning for large and BOT projects: A holistic framework. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
Large engineering projects embody a number of special aspects and unique characteristics in comparison to smaller undertakings. Additionally, a growing number of large projects are undertaken employing the Build-Operate-Transfer ('BOT') approach, significantly increasing the project's complexity. With the BOT model of project delivery, the private sector finances, builds and operates a revenue-generating project, usually one which would have traditionally been executed in the public sector. Despite the range of available risk assessment methods and techniques, significant aspects of the challenges which large and BOT projects face may be attributed to shortcomings in current risk planning processes. On larger projects, risk planning is important as risks are more numerous; additionally on BOT projects risks are not only more numerous, many are novel and longer-lasting. The unique aspects of large engineering projects were defined, with a view to provide guidance to participants. The 'BOT' project delivery process was examined, and through an examination of the approach, the six phases of 'PEN-BOT' were proposed (Propose, Evaluate, Negotiate, Build, Operate, Transfer) as a better description of the phases and the process. A survey illustrating the increasing popularity of the PEN-BOT approach was presented, including a detailed case study of the Channel Crossing project, outlining both the prevalence and the unique challenges of the such projects and lessons drawn from the problems encountered. The attitudes and perceptions of project participants respecting risk planning issues were surveyed in a working environment through a Project Planning Issues Questionnaire. The significant differences, amongst project participants, in risk and project planning attitudes and perceptions was revealed with a number of recommendations addressing these problems developed. A Holistic Risk Planning Framework was presented as a map of a process to address many issues which in themselves, are difficult to structure, particularly within the environment of larse and PEN-BOT projects. The Framework defines an approach to formalize and organize risk planning processes with the benefits of identifying linkages, gaps and weaknesses in the planning process, and thus enhancing the project's chance of success.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Russell, A D |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; private sector; build-operate-transfer; project delivery; project planning; risk assessment; case study |
| Index terms: | linkage, private sector, public sector, planning process, case study, project delivery, risk assessment, build-operate-transfer, face, survey, revenue, complexity, project planning, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, economic analysis, project delivery, psychology, control systems, data collection methods, business, industry analysis, administrative law, systems engineering, project controls, financial risk |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Time Control, Legal Issues, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here