Types of construction claims: A Portuguese survey

Moura, H and Teixeira, J C (2007) Types of construction claims: A Portuguese survey. In: Boyd, D (ed.) Proceedings of 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2007, Belfast, UK.

Abstract

Dealing with construction claims is a difficult task nowadays. Not only claims became an inescapable issue in construction project management but analysing and resolving them adequately raises a number of difficulties. The first step for overcoming this problem is an adequate claims classification and identification. In Portugal, previous studies had identified eight different types of construction claim each one of them covered a specific process of documentation, submission, quantification and settlement, in the scope of the Portuguese construction legal frame. In order to evaluate which type of claims are currently presented in construction projects concluded in Portugal, an internet based inquiry was settled to owners and contractors. The results indicate that changes claim, particularly the subtypes direct changes, indirect changes and errors and omissions, represents 64% of claims presented in the construction projects surveyed, and together with delay claims, represented an aggregated frequency of 84%. In respect to the amounts requested and paid, the ratio was 0.76.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: claims; conflict; Portugal
Index terms: quantification, Portugal, survey, documentation, owner, construction project management, construction project, construction claim, internet
Subjects: production management, Geography, professional development, project management theory and practice, payment, measurement and scaling, sociology, data collection methods, computing systems
Topics: Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here