Bearup, W K (1995) An environment to support computer-assisted design review. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Abstract
In recent years productivity of the U.S. construction industry has lagged behind other sectors of the economy, resulting in higher costs of goods and services for all consumers. Construction productivity can be enhanced by the increased use of automation in the facility delivery process. The review of design drawings is one manual operation that could benefit from increased automation. Design reviews are currently performed by human experts who evaluate a set of construction documents for adequacy and accuracy. Errors or omissions in the construction documents that are not detected by the human reviewers can result in increased construction time and costs and decreased construction productivity. This research examines the feasibility of linking a knowledge-based system (KBS) with a computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) program to create an environment to support interactive computer-assisted design reviews. The basic approach used in developing the Computer-Assisted Design Review and Evaluation (CADRE) system was to analyze design review comments prepared by human experts, then define a computer environment to replicate the reasoning processes that had been applied. During this research 1,469 manually-generated design comments from historical projects were collected and reviewed. A total of 715 comments were identified and analyzed that specifically addressed the construction drawings. The analysis of these design review comments was then used to create an object-oriented facility model and to develop a knowledge base for automated design review. This research found that approximately 75 percent of the design review comments could have been duplicated by a computer system based on an IBM-compatible personal computer using off-the-shelf software.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Boyer, L T |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; drafting; reasoning; automation; computer-aided design; knowledge-based system; productivity |
| Index terms: | program, documents, computer aided design, computer system, reasoning, knowledge base, drawing, accuracy, drafting, construction industry, construction productivity, automation, construction time, knowledge-based system, productivity, design drawing |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, information systems, project controls, cognitive psychology, automation and robotics, professional development, management, software systems, artificial intelligence, operations management, technical documentation, computing systems, computational design |
| Topics: | Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here